Resources
Playbooks, guides, and best practices for AI-native E2E testing.
Agent-Native CI: What Changes When the Agent Triages Its Own Failures
CI has spent twenty years assuming a human reads the red build. When an agent can read the run logs and the uploaded screenshots and traces, classify the failure, fix what is genuinely a test issue, rerun it, and open a pull request, the pipeline changes shape. Here is the loop, the guardrails, and the part that stays human.
The Agent-Native Developer Workflow: What a Day Looks Like When Agents Do the Work
When agents write most of the code, the developer's day stops being typing and becomes stating intent, reading plans, and reviewing evidence. Here is the actual loop, the four places humans still intervene, what it does to code review, specs and CI, and the parts that genuinely do not work yet.
Agent-Native vs Agentic vs AI-Native: What Each Term Actually Means
AI-native describes what a product is built around. Agentic describes how it behaves. Agent-native describes who can operate it. The three are used interchangeably and they answer different questions, which is why a product can be agentic without being agent-native and agent-native without being agentic at all.
How Much Does Shiplight Cost? Plans, Rates, and What a Real Month Looks Like
Shiplight is $0 on Free and $60 a month on Pro, with Enterprise contract priced. Every feature ships on every plan; what changes is included credit, retention, and pay-as-you-go. Here are the published rates and how to work out your own bill before you sign up.
How to Evaluate a Tool That Claims to Be Agent-Native
The label is unverifiable and the mechanism is not. Five questions separate software your coding agent can actually operate from software with agent language on the homepage: can my agent call it, where does the output live, can the agent read the result, what happens on failure, and where is the human.
Where the Human Belongs When Agents Write the Tests
The strongest objection to AI-written tests is not that AI cannot write them. It is that a passing test proves nothing: high coverage, confident test names, and no actual verification underneath. That objection is correct, and the answer is structure rather than trust.